hehe  :-)

2014-07-10 11:50 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>:

> Took longer though :-)
>
> Tom
>
> On 10/07/14 10:42, Carlos Rovira wrote:
> > Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;)
> >
> >
> > 2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>:
> >
> >> It was so much easier with SVN...
> >>
> >> Tom
> >>
> >> On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote:
> >>> Hi Erik,
> >>>
> >>> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria
> >> based on best practices of git.
> >>> Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches
> >> updated using a commit merge node from latest commit on develop, isn’t
> it?.
> >> Well, this practice cause a big complexity on tree node and a messy
> >> traceability of branch content.
> >>> I was proposing you another way, using a combination of git-rebase and
> >> git-merge operations, in order to use git-rebase onto develop to
> maintain
> >> your branch updated, and git-merge to apply the complete final
> change-set
> >> on develop when developing is finished.
> >>> But, as I told you, it was a simple proposal only, and if you don't
> feel
> >> like to adopt it, just forget it and remove the proposed branch. I did
> the
> >> push to allow you can see the result of the proposed way vs your
> currently
> >> way at same time, on commits tree.
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> ______________________
> >>> Jose Barragan
> >>> Senior Software Engineer
> >>> Codeoscopic
> >>> +34 912 94 80 80
> >>> http://www.codeoscopic.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> José,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm confused. What was I doing wrong that made this necessary?
> >>>>
> >>>> EdB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Jose Barragan <josebarra...@apache.org>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>> Hi Erik,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While I was preparing to reactivate the maven branch of falcon's
> >> project,
> >>>>> I have taken the opportunity to rebase your new branch "VF2JS", onto
> >> the
> >>>>> latest develop commit, with the intention that you get the new branch
> >> and
> >>>>> could continue your develop on it, using “git rebase” to maintain
> your
> >>>>> branch updated until the merge time. If you don’t feel happy with
> this
> >>>>> proposal, feel free to completely remove it, but if you feel
> >> confortable
> >>>>> with new branch and git practice, we can completely remove the old
> >>>>> "current" branch version VS2JS.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I was only tried to help, with our git usage on apache flex
> >> repositories.
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> ______________________
> >>>>> *Jose Barragan*
> >>>>> *Senior Software Engineer*
> >>>>> *josebarra...@apache.org
> >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','josebarra...@apache.org');>*
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Ix Multimedia Software
> >>>>
> >>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
> >>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
> >>>>
> >>>> T. 06-51952295
> >>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
> >>> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud
> service.
> >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
> >>> ______________________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>


-- 
Carlos Rovira
Director de Tecnología
M: +34 607 22 60 05
F:  +34 912 94 80 80
http://www.codeoscopic.com
http://www.directwriter.es
http://www.avant2.es

Reply via email to