hehe :-)
2014-07-10 11:50 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>: > Took longer though :-) > > Tom > > On 10/07/14 10:42, Carlos Rovira wrote: > > Yeah!, It was even easier when we used an abacus ;) > > > > > > 2014-07-10 11:14 GMT+02:00 Tom Chiverton <t...@extravision.com>: > > > >> It was so much easier with SVN... > >> > >> Tom > >> > >> On 10/07/14 10:02, Jose Barragan wrote: > >>> Hi Erik, > >>> > >>> Nothing is really wrong there, is just for an philosophical criteria > >> based on best practices of git. > >>> Currently, you and rest of apache flex team, maintains your branches > >> updated using a commit merge node from latest commit on develop, isn’t > it?. > >> Well, this practice cause a big complexity on tree node and a messy > >> traceability of branch content. > >>> I was proposing you another way, using a combination of git-rebase and > >> git-merge operations, in order to use git-rebase onto develop to > maintain > >> your branch updated, and git-merge to apply the complete final > change-set > >> on develop when developing is finished. > >>> But, as I told you, it was a simple proposal only, and if you don't > feel > >> like to adopt it, just forget it and remove the proposed branch. I did > the > >> push to allow you can see the result of the proposed way vs your > currently > >> way at same time, on commits tree. > >>> Thanks, > >>> ______________________ > >>> Jose Barragan > >>> Senior Software Engineer > >>> Codeoscopic > >>> +34 912 94 80 80 > >>> http://www.codeoscopic.com > >>> > >>> > >>> On 10 Jul 2014, at 07:29, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: > >>> > >>>> José, > >>>> > >>>> I'm confused. What was I doing wrong that made this necessary? > >>>> > >>>> EdB > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Thursday, July 10, 2014, Jose Barragan <josebarra...@apache.org> > >> wrote: > >>>>> Hi Erik, > >>>>> > >>>>> While I was preparing to reactivate the maven branch of falcon's > >> project, > >>>>> I have taken the opportunity to rebase your new branch "VF2JS", onto > >> the > >>>>> latest develop commit, with the intention that you get the new branch > >> and > >>>>> could continue your develop on it, using “git rebase” to maintain > your > >>>>> branch updated until the merge time. If you don’t feel happy with > this > >>>>> proposal, feel free to completely remove it, but if you feel > >> confortable > >>>>> with new branch and git practice, we can completely remove the old > >>>>> "current" branch version VS2JS. > >>>>> > >>>>> I was only tried to help, with our git usage on apache flex > >> repositories. > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> ______________________ > >>>>> *Jose Barragan* > >>>>> *Senior Software Engineer* > >>>>> *josebarra...@apache.org > >>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','josebarra...@apache.org');>* > >>>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Ix Multimedia Software > >>>> > >>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 > >>>> 3521 VB Utrecht > >>>> > >>>> T. 06-51952295 > >>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl > >>> ______________________________________________________________________ > >>> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud > service. > >>> For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com > >>> ______________________________________________________________________ > >>> > >> > > > > -- Carlos Rovira Director de Tecnología M: +34 607 22 60 05 F: +34 912 94 80 80 http://www.codeoscopic.com http://www.directwriter.es http://www.avant2.es