On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 12:29 AM, OK <okrue...@edscha.com> wrote: > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > Are you using the command prompt or Cygwin? > > Command prompt. Is Cygwin needed or a better way? >
Not necessarily. I have Cygwin installed and it seems to work fine. I have not been able to test without Cygwin. If we can use FlexJS on Windows without Cygwin, that would be a big win. What error do you get when you simply try to run asjsc without the full path on Command Prompt? > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > I don't think mxmlc is supposed to work with this project. We are having > > a > > lengthy discussion about this in another thread. Try compiling any > > project > > under examples/flexjs with mxmlc. Projects under examples/native will > > work > > fine with asjsc. > > I only followed your instructions like a monkey: ;-) > Not your fault. The instructions were incorrect :-) > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > ... > > Windows: > > mxmlc > > > "C:\Users\omuppirala\AppData\Roaming\npm\node_modules\flexjs\examples\native\USStatesMap\src\USStatesMap.as" > > ... > > Just tested "examples/flexjs/DataBindingExample" and it works, great! > Awesome! > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > Not sure how to test this at this point. Once we resolve the discussion > > in > > that other thread, we should be able to make progress on this use case. > > Probably we talk past each other. > I'd like to simply call the generated .js file in a browser. > I looked at the generated "examples/flexjs/DataBindingExample/index.html" > and modify it. > And this works for me, so the asjsc test is successful also: > > <!DOCTYPE html> > <html> > <head> > <meta http-equiv="X-UA-Compatible" content="IE=edge,chrome=1"> > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> > > > </head> > <body> > > </body> > </html> > That's perfect. We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a better first impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS. > > One last, perhaps stupid question: > Is there a difference between the FlexJS installation that is installed by > using the standard installer respectively your node module? > Techinically, there should be no difference. They should exactly be the same. If there are differences, they would be considered bugs. I have not ported over the IDE based stuff from the Installer because this is intended only for command prompt usage via node/npm. > > At least your node module encourage me to get in touch with FlexJS for the > first time! > Thanks for that and for providing this cool node module!!! > That is great to hear. That is exactly the idea. Installing via the Apache Flex Installer seems like a cumbersome way to introduce newcomers to FlexJS. And managing projects using npm seems to be the in thing in the JavaScript world today. Hence this attempt :-) Thanks again for trying this out! Regards, Om > > Olaf > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51048.html > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
