On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> That might be tricky. Maybe you could register a Node script instead. This might work. I will try it out. > It > might be able to tell if it's running in cmd/PowerShell versus Cygwin. Then > it can choose to run either asjsc or asjsc.bat. > > I'm pretty sure that Windows will run asjsc.bat even if you omit the .bat > extension, if you run it directly from cmd/PowerShell. However, I wonder if > there's a difference because it's being run indirectly through Node. > Yeah, it's looking for sh.exe in some wrong location. Which is the cause of the 'The system cannot find the path specified.' error message. > > - Josh > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:37 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:33 PM, Josh Tynjala <joshtynj...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Yes, on the Windows command prompt (and PowerShell), you need to run > .bat > > > version of the script. The shell script may work correctly in Cygwin, > > > though. > > > > > > > Is there a good way to npm to register asjsc for OSX/Cygwin and asjsc.bat > > for Command Prompt/PowerShell? > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > > > > > > - Josh > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 3:23 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala < > > bigosma...@gmail.com> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 1:26 AM, OK <okrue...@edscha.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > > > > > If we can use FlexJS on Windows without Cygwin, that would be a > big > > > > win. > > > > > > > > > > For me it seems that it works without Cygwin. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > > > > > What error do you get when you simply try to run asjsc without > the > > > full > > > > > > path on Command Prompt? > > > > > > > > > > "The system can't find the specified path" (Translated from german) > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am seeing this problem as well from Command Prompt. I think we > need > > to > > > > use asjsc.cmd instead of asjsc for Command Prompt. I will tinker > with > > > this > > > > a bit and see if we can get this working. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Om > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > OmPrakash Muppirala wrote > > > > > > We are discussing if we should have asjsc generate this > > > > > > simple html file by default so that newcomers like you have a > > better > > > > > first > > > > > > impression and an easier starting point with FlexJS. > > > > > > > > > > +1 (If there are no disadvantages with creating this html file) > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Olaf > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://apache-flex-development.2333347.n4.nabble.com/FlexJS-Need-your-help-testing-the-flexjs-npm-module-tp50911p51050.html > > > > > Sent from the Apache Flex Development mailing list archive at > > > Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
