On 3/9/16, 12:11 PM, "[email protected] on behalf of OmPrakash Muppirala" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
>Just a few notes: > >1. I see several releases that did not happen in the last quarter. Is >that necessary? We've been doing this for several reports. The board likes to see the latest release date and because we have several releases, I list them all. IMO, it makes us look like an active project and makes us think about if any release is getting too stale. >2. I would like to see a note about work towards flexjs npm module Will add. >3. The numbers look okay to me. For TDF, I'd say get the numbers just >for >this quarter. If you get the uniques, they will be only for the date >range >you specify. Not sure what you meant here. I'm not sure how much the board cares about TDF traffic. It was a useful data point when TDF was a recent release, but now I'm wondering if it is worth reporting at all. The 65,000 number is for the uniques since the first TDF release. Should the numbers for a quarter be the uniques or not and why will the board care? How does TDF traffic today help us gauge the health of the project? >4. Most importantly, can we get some feedback on what the Board has to >say >about the report and Apache Flex project? Would be nice to see this >feedback shared with the community. Right now, the board meetings are a >bit of a black box. Hmm. I wonder if board comments are public or if I have to ask first? Any actionable responses result in some email from me on the dev@ list at some point in time. The two comments on the last report were about using JIRA to track any code adoptions, and that one board member liked the format of the report. -Alex
