Hi - Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. > > If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s value I > can recognize. > > The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved in the > project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. > > Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do about mine. > > A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to delay > the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can we try and > pick one quickly? Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result then we can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. Regards, Dave > > Harbs > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira <carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> >> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important for >> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >> >> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is important in >> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't get a >> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we explain >> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, since >> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and >> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other than JS!! >> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >> >> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for
