I think the momentum is shifting and the vote will be about some other name.
-Alex On 9/13/17, 2:46 PM, "Dave Fisher" <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >When we start the VOTE I suggest the following ballot: > >VOTE Should the Project Name of the Proposed Fork be FlexJS? > >[ ] Yes - The forked project should be Apache FlexJS. >[ ] No - The forked project should have another name which will be >discussed. >[ ] Abstain - Don’t care what the forked project is called. > >Discuss? > >Regards, >Dave > >> On Sep 13, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Piotr Zarzycki <piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com> >>wrote: >> >> +1 for Dave's proposition on starting the VOTE for name change. >> >> I would like to also add that Carlos's proposition for help to build new >> brand triggers me. Peter helped also do understand that we can always >>state >> from where we have come and what was our story. >> >> I'm going to change my mind on name changing and pickup "Royale" as the >> most powerful for the new one. - The main question is can we use it >>since >> it was code name of Macromedia Framework ? >> >> Thanks, >> Piotr >> >> 2017-09-13 22:59 GMT+02:00 Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: >> >>> Hi - >>> >>> Sent from my iPhone >>> >>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 1:40 PM, Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Carlos’ argument carries weight to me. >>>> >>>> If a new name will help motivate him in terms of marketing it, that’s >>> value I can recognize. >>>> >>>> The name is not as important to me as motivating people to be involved >>> in the project. We can build whatever messages we want around the name. >>>> >>>> Carlos clearly feels more passionate about his position than I do >>>>about >>> mine. >>>> >>>> A hesitation I have about picking a new name is that I don’t want to >>> delay the board’s decision on the new PMC. If we go for a new name can >>>we >>> try and pick one quickly? >>> >>> Let's start the FlexJS yes or no vote tonight or tomorrow morning. >>> >>> In parallel we can discuss other names if a new name is the result >>>then we >>> can immediately start the next vote. We have just enough time. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Dave >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Harbs >>>> >>>>> On Sep 13, 2017, at 9:20 PM, Carlos Rovira < >>> carlos.rov...@codeoscopic.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm putting some efforts here since I think this is really important >>>>>for >>>>> all of us and for our beloved FlexJS project. >>>>> >>>>> Name, website and all the visuals behind it matters....and is >>>>>important >>> in >>>>> a way many of us in this community maybe can't imagine. If we don't >>>>>get >>> a >>>>> fresh and compelling name and a clean and beautiful site where we >>> explain >>>>> all the great things our technology can do, we are losing our time, >>> since >>>>> this project will end with the bulk of the others xxxJS projects, and >>>>> that's even horrible when our tech could be used for things other >>>>>than >>> JS!! >>>>> (If we want in future years to make it possible). >>>>> >>>>> @Alex: I Think we can't have a PROJECT name != of PRODUCT name for >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> >> Piotr Zarzycki >> >> mobile: +48 880 859 557 >> skype: zarzycki10 >> >> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/piotrzarzycki >> <https://pl.linkedin.com/in/piotr-zarzycki-92a53552> >
