I just checked GA:

All numbers are for the last month, independent of the Flink version:
aws.html: 918 pageviews
mapr_setup.html: 108 pageviews
gce_setup.html: 256 pageviews

Some other deployment-related pages for reference:
yarn_setup: 4687
cluster: 4284
kubernetes: 3428





On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 1:53 PM Trevor Grant <trevor.d.gr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Same as Ufuk (non-binding)
>
> In general, docs pages are great "first commits" to leave out there as
> newb-issues.
>
> Also though, worth checking how often people use the page (e.g. GA)
>
> 3rd option: add a `.bu` to AWS/GCE pages and open a JIRA ticket to fix them
> (and put a readme explaining why they are in `.bu` status (which should
> prevent the build from picking them up), in essence, you're commenting them
> all out until someone can come around fix them.
>
> Further, I would put a holder page in their place that says something like,
> "This works, but we need someone to update the docs- check out JIRA XXXX
> for more details", might get someone to clean em up sooner w a little
> advertising.
>
> Just my .02
>
> I can't do full overhauls right now, but I could execute the "comment out"
> option if it comes to that.
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 6:35 AM Ufuk Celebi <u...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > +1 to drop the MapR page.
> >
> > For the other two I'm +0. I fully agree that the linked AWS and GCE pages
> > are in bad shape and don't relate to a component developed by the
> > community. Do we have any numbers from Google Analytics on how popular
> > those pages are? If they are somewhat popular, I would prefer to "fix
> them"
> > to be good starting points for users in those environments (probably by
> > boiling them down to saying something simple such as "You should use
> > FileSystem [...] and point it to [...].").
> >
> > – Ufuk
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 10:49 AM Till Rohrmann <trohrm...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > If the community cannot manage to keep the vendor-specific
> documentation
> > up
> > > to date, then I believe it is better to drop it. Hence +1 for the
> > proposal.
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > Till
> > >
> > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:12 PM Aljoscha Krettek <aljos...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Aljoscha
> > > >
> > > > > On 2. Dec 2019, at 18:38, Konstantin Knauf <
> konstan...@ververica.com
> > >
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1 from my side to drop.
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 6:34 PM Seth Wiesman <sjwies...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >> Hi all,
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I'd like to discuss dropping vendor-specific deployment
> > documentation
> > > > from
> > > > >> Flink's official docs. To be clear, I am *NOT* suggesting we drop
> > any of
> > > > >> the filesystem documentation, but the following three pages.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> AWS:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/ops/deployment/aws.html
> > > > >> Google Compute Engine:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/ops/deployment/gce_setup.html
> > > > >> MapR:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > >
> >
> >
> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-master/ops/deployment/mapr_setup.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Unlike the filesystems, these docs do not refer to components
> > > > maintained by
> > > > >> the Apache Flink community, but external commercial services and
> > > > products.
> > > > >> None of these pages are well maintained and I do not think the
> > > > open-source
> > > > >> community can reasonably be expected to keep them up to date. In
> > > > >> particular,
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>   - The AWS page contains sparse information and mostly just links
> > to
> > > > the
> > > > >>   official EMR docs.
> > > > >>   - The Google Compute Engine page is out of date and the commands
> > do
> > > > not
> > > > >>   work.
> > > > >>   - MapR contains some relevant information but the community has
> > > > already
> > > > >>   dropped the MapR filesystem so I am not sure that deployment
> would
> > > > work
> > > > >> (I
> > > > >>   have not tested).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> There is also a larger question of which vendor products should be
> > > > included
> > > > >> and which should not. That is why I would like to suggest dropping
> > these
> > > > >> pages and referring users to vendor maintained documentation
> > whenever
> > > > they
> > > > >> are using one of these services.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Seth Wiesman
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Konstantin Knauf | Solutions Architect
> > > > >
> > > > > +49 160 91394525
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Follow us @VervericaData Ververica <https://www.ververica.com/>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Join Flink Forward <https://flink-forward.org/> - The Apache Flink
> > > > > Conference
> > > > >
> > > > > Stream Processing | Event Driven | Real Time
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > Ververica GmbH | Invalidenstrasse 115, 10115 Berlin, Germany
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Ververica GmbH
> > > > > Registered at Amtsgericht Charlottenburg: HRB 158244 B
> > > > > Managing Directors: Timothy Alexander Steinert, Yip Park Tung
> Jason,
> > Ji
> > > > > (Tony) Cheng
> > > >
> > > >
> >
>

Reply via email to