Thorsten Scherler wrote:
Gidday,

here is a proposal for a new skinconf format. http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs/forrest/trunk/plugins/org.apache.forrest.plugin.viewHelper/src/documentation/skinconf.proposal.xml?view=auto&rev=160783

+0

This is based on the recent user discussion (skinconf text elements in
group.svg) which showed again that our skinconf needs to be more
extensible without touching the dtd.

+1

e.g.
<forrest:property contract="copyright">
  <!-- The following are used to construct a copyright statement -->
  <year>2005</year>
  <vendor>The Apache Software Foundation.</vendor>
  <copyright-link>http://www.apache.org/licenses/</copyright-link>
</forrest:property>

The idea is to allow all xml within a forrest:property.

What about the proposal already in SVN, that we have discussed before?
Why not make the DTD completely correct without having all xml inside forrest:property?


--
Nicola Ken Barozzi                   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
            - verba volant, scripta manent -
   (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------



Reply via email to