Hi, > Le 25 févr. 2017 à 10:16, Christoph Rüger <c.rue...@synesty.com> a écrit : > > +1 for incubator-freemarker-online-tester > > Am 25.02.2017 11:10 vorm. schrieb "Daniel Dekany" <ddek...@freemail.hu>: > > Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote: > >> I'd probably add something (like tester) as just -online doesn't seem to >> say what it is. > > So then how about incubator-freemarker-online-tester? (I'm not afraid > of long names... :) )
Typescript, Go and Swift all have « playgrounds ». What I would suggest is: (incubator-)try-freemarker-online — Denis. >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> > wrote: >> >>> I will request a Git repo for the evaluator service. Then I will ask >>> Kenshoo to submit an ICLA, and make a pull request on that repository. >>> >>> What should be the name of the repository? If nobody says otherwise, >>> it will be incubating-freemarker-online. (See our currently existing >>> repos here: http://freemarker.org/sourcecode.html) >>> >>> >>> Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 3:32:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >>>> Done, good news :) >>>> >>>> Jacques >>>> >>>> >>>> Le 08/02/2017 à 15:03, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>>> They say the are will to donate the freemarker-online source code to >>>>> ASF. Does someone want to help out with the paper work, like sending >>>>> them the file to fill and sign and post, etc.? >>>>> >>>>> I have also posted to INFRA-13246 about this, but couldn't change the >>>>> status to "wariting for infra". Jacques, do you have the right to do >>>>> that? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 6:48:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 17:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>>>>>>> Nope (as far as I know)... I was hoping that INFRA-13246 will have >>>>>>>>> some kind of positive feedback first, but it seems it has to be > the >>>>>>>>> other way around then. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Anyway, have you seen and reactions on our proposal? In case you >>> have >>>>>>>>> met someone face to face or something... >>>>>>>> I must say I'm reluctant to push the request more w/o nothing in >>>>>>>> hand, or at least nothing more to say (like we contacted them, we >>> begin to work on >>>>>>>> it, etc., ie some action engaged) >>>>>>> OK, I will ask Kenshoo (the owner of freemarker-online) now... >>>>>> Thanks I'm sure this will help >>>>>> >>>>>> Jacques >>>>>> >>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 3:00:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Any news about this? Somebody contacted them? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It would help to push INFRA-13246 >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 13:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if we >>> can >>>>>>>>>>> offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden > for >>>>>>>>>>> them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's >>> just >>>>>>>>>>> good PR. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the >>> site/service: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker >>> template by >>>>>>>>>>>>> providing the template code and its context. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service > to >>> the users >>>>>>>>>>>>> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a >>> very useful >>>>>>>>>>>>> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is an interest in this community then we could move > in >>> two >>>>>>>>>>>>> directions: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and >>> see if they >>>>>>>>>>>>> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our >>> community and help >>>>>>>>>>>>> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then > we >>> could >>>>>>>>>>>>> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the > possibility >>> to set up a >>>>>>>>>>>>> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use >>> to deploy a >>>>>>>>>>>>> similar service, from our official website >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any >>> volunteers for >>>>>>>>>>>>> #2 (or even #1)? >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Jacopo >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here: >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for > OFBiz >>>>>>>>>>>> I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this >>> task. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Jacques >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel Dekany >>> >>> > > -- > Thanks, > Daniel Dekany > > -- > Synesty GmbH > Moritz-von-Rohr-Str. 1a > 07745 Jena > Tel.: +49 3641 559649 > Fax.: +49 3641 5596499 > Internet: http://synesty.com > > Geschäftsführer: Christoph Rüger > Unternehmenssitz: Jena > Handelsregister B beim Amtsgericht: Jena > Handelsregister-Nummer: HRB 508766 > Ust-IdNr.: DE287564982
