OK, so it seems this was the most preferred name, so I have made the Infra task for it:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-13583 Sunday, February 26, 2017, 5:47:16 AM, Woonsan Ko wrote: > On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 10:55 PM, Barrie Selack <bar...@rockhopper.com> wrote: >> +! for incubator-freemarker-online-tester > > +1. Me too. > > Regards, > > Woonsan > >> >> >> On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 5:09 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> wrote: >> >>> Friday, February 24, 2017, 10:42:46 PM, Barrie Selack wrote: >>> >>> > I'd probably add something (like tester) as just -online doesn't seem to >>> > say what it is. >>> >>> So then how about incubator-freemarker-online-tester? (I'm not afraid >>> of long names... :) ) >>> >>> > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Daniel Dekany <ddek...@freemail.hu> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> >> I will request a Git repo for the evaluator service. Then I will ask >>> >> Kenshoo to submit an ICLA, and make a pull request on that repository. >>> >> >>> >> What should be the name of the repository? If nobody says otherwise, >>> >> it will be incubating-freemarker-online. (See our currently existing >>> >> repos here: http://freemarker.org/sourcecode.html) >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> Wednesday, February 8, 2017, 3:32:49 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >> >>> >> > Done, good news :) >>> >> > >>> >> > Jacques >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> > Le 08/02/2017 à 15:03, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> >> >> They say the are will to donate the freemarker-online source code to >>> >> >> ASF. Does someone want to help out with the paper work, like sending >>> >> >> them the file to fill and sign and post, etc.? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> I have also posted to INFRA-13246 about this, but couldn't change the >>> >> >> status to "wariting for infra". Jacques, do you have the right to do >>> >> >> that? >>> >> >> >>> >> >> >>> >> >> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 6:48:15 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >> >> >>> >> >>> Le 21/01/2017 à 17:58, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> >> >>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 5:17:33 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >> >>>> >>> >> >>>>> Le 21/01/2017 à 16:11, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> >> >>>>>> Nope (as far as I know)... I was hoping that INFRA-13246 will >>> have >>> >> >>>>>> some kind of positive feedback first, but it seems it has to be >>> the >>> >> >>>>>> other way around then. >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Anyway, have you seen and reactions on our proposal? In case you >>> >> have >>> >> >>>>>> met someone face to face or something... >>> >> >>>>> I must say I'm reluctant to push the request more w/o nothing in >>> >> >>>>> hand, or at least nothing more to say (like we contacted them, we >>> >> begin to work on >>> >> >>>>> it, etc., ie some action engaged) >>> >> >>>> OK, I will ask Kenshoo (the owner of freemarker-online) now... >>> >> >>> Thanks I'm sure this will help >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>> Jacques >>> >> >>> >>> >> >>>>> Jacques >>> >> >>>>> >>> >> >>>>>> Saturday, January 21, 2017, 3:00:47 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >> >>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Any news about this? Somebody contacted them? >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> It would help to push INFRA-13246 >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Thanks >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Jacques >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 13:27, Daniel Dekany a écrit : >>> >> >>>>>>>> Probably there will be a higher chance for positive answer if >>> we >>> >> can >>> >> >>>>>>>> offer running the service too. Because I guess that's a burden >>> for >>> >> >>>>>>>> them, while owning a piece of software on GitHub is not, that's >>> >> just >>> >> >>>>>>>> good PR. >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>> Tuesday, January 3, 2017, 12:53:12 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote: >>> >> >>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Le 03/01/2017 à 09:32, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit : >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Hi all, >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> a couple of days ago Daniel brought to my attention the >>> >> site/service: >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> http://freemarker-online.kenshoo.com/ >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> They provide a nice online tool to evaluate any Freemarker >>> >> template by >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> providing the template code and its context. >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Wouldn't be nice is we could offer that or a similar service >>> to >>> >> the users >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> and potential adopters of Freemarker? I think it would be a >>> >> very useful >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> tool and also a good mechanism to attract new consumers. >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> If there is an interest in this community then we could move >>> in >>> >> two >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> directions: >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 1) get in touch with the maintainers of freemarker-online and >>> >> see if they >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> are interested to contribute their work [*] or join our >>> >> community and help >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> to build a similar one here; if they are not interested then >>> we >>> >> could >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> discuss if it would make sense to build our own here >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> 2) get in touch with the Infra team and explore the >>> possibility >>> >> to set up a >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> virtual machine to dedicated to our project that we could use >>> >> to deploy a >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> similar service, from our official website >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> I can volunteer to try to get in touch with them (#1); any >>> >> volunteers for >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> #2 (or even #1)? >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Kind regards, >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> Jacopo >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> [*] which is licensed with the AL2.0 and available here: >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/kenshoo/freemarker-online >>> >> >>>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jacopo, >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> I can take care of 2, I'm used to these kind of things for >>> OFBiz >>> >> >>>>>>>>> I guess 1 is a prerequisite and I'm not well placed for this >>> >> task. >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> Jacques >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>>>>>>>> >>> >> >>> >>> >> > >>> >> > >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Thanks, >>> >> Daniel Dekany >>> >> >>> >> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks, >>> Daniel Dekany >>> >>> > -- Thanks, Daniel Dekany
