I'm not an expert at .NET development so please bear with me. In that world, is CLI synonymous with C#? It seems that people who want a non-Java client for Geode would be thinking of it in terms of programming language, which is why I suggested csharp. It seems like people writing Geode clients currently have three options for programming language: Java, C++, and C#.
Sarge > On 16 Jan, 2017, at 08:45, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:35 AM Michael William Dodge <mdo...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > >> Given that the current source structure uses cpp and cli prefixes for the >> C++ and .NET clients, respectively, what about using cpp and cli for the >> directories, allowing any new .NET development to go into a separate >> directory (perhaps cs or csharp) without any additional moves? >> > > Sarge, > > Given that .NET/CLI is language independent, calling a forthcoming pure CLI > client after it's potential language would not be appropriate. > > If the concerns is more moves than leaving everything under a > "geode-native" directory might make most sense. Later we could add > "geode-cli" when the new pure CLI client is developed. Then slowly phase > out the CLI inside the "geode-native". > > -Jake
