I'm not an expert at .NET development so please bear with me. In that world, is 
CLI synonymous with C#? It seems that people who want a non-Java client for 
Geode would be thinking of it in terms of programming language, which is why I 
suggested csharp. It seems like people writing Geode clients currently have 
three options for programming language: Java, C++, and C#.

Sarge

> On 16 Jan, 2017, at 08:45, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 8:35 AM Michael William Dodge <mdo...@pivotal.io>
> wrote:
> 
>> Given that the current source structure uses cpp and cli prefixes for the
>> C++ and .NET clients, respectively, what about using cpp and cli for the
>> directories, allowing any new .NET development to go into a separate
>> directory (perhaps cs or csharp) without any additional moves?
>> 
> 
> Sarge,
> 
> Given that .NET/CLI is language independent, calling a forthcoming pure CLI
> client after it's potential language would not be appropriate.
> 
> If the concerns is more moves than leaving everything under a
> "geode-native" directory might make most sense. Later we could add
> "geode-cli" when the new pure CLI client is developed. Then slowly phase
> out the CLI inside the "geode-native".
> 
> -Jake

Reply via email to