Think further, what about the team that ask that I be able to mange a region not all regions, or a wan not all wan. It may be time to think about a full per instance / named resource based security model.
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:59 PM Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > +1 > > I think it would also be a good idea to move the current operations > permitted by CLUSTER:MANAGE ( stop server, alter runtime, etc) to require > the more specific CLUSTER:MANAGE:MEMBER in order to avoid ambiguity. (This > is not a breaking change since CLUSTER:MANAGE implies > CLUSTER:MANAGE:MEMBER.) > > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> > wrote: > > > > In our current security model, a user with DATA:MANAGE can create > regions, > > create disk stores, WAN gateways etc. I think this is a very wide scope, > > because an administrator may want to give create region privilege to a > > developer, but not necessarily give them the ability to create disk > stores > > or send the data in that region over WAN. I propose that we refine the > > security model to make it finer grained. > > > > I propose that Disk, WAN and AsyncQueue be treated as resources in the > > security framework. These resources will be controlled at the CLUSTER > > level. As with any other resource, admins will be able to grant READ, > WRITE > > and MANAGE permissions to these resources. In terms of shiro, this will > > take the form: CLUSTER:READ/WRITE/MANAGE:DISK,WAN,ASYNCQUEUE. > > > > Here is how it will work out for each resource: > > DISK > > 1. CLUSTER:MANAGE:DISK - allows users to create/manage disk stores > > 2. CLUSTER:WRITE:DISK - allows users to create regions that > write/overflow > > to disk stores > > 3. CLUSTER:READ:DISK - should be covered by DATA:READ, does not make > sense > > here > > > > WAN: > > 1. CLUSTER:MANAGE:WAN - allows users to create gateway senders and > receivers > > 2. CLUSTER:WRITE:WAN - allows users to create regions that write data to > > gateway senders > > 3. CLUSTER:READ:WAN - allows users to create regions that read data from > > gateway receivers > > > > We can add other things like functions here as well. > > > > Thoughts? > >
