DATA:*:RegionA would allow you to only operate that region but not all of them.
if we want to control a specific wan, maybe we add a fourth parameter: cluster:*:wan:wanName, same goes for Disk etc. On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Jacob Barrett <jbarr...@pivotal.io> wrote: > Think further, what about the team that ask that I be able to mange a > region not all regions, or a wan not all wan. It may be time to think about > a full per instance / > named resource based security model. > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 2:59 PM Jared Stewart <jstew...@pivotal.io> wrote: > > > +1 > > > > I think it would also be a good idea to move the current operations > > permitted by CLUSTER:MANAGE ( stop server, alter runtime, etc) to require > > the more specific CLUSTER:MANAGE:MEMBER in order to avoid ambiguity. > (This > > is not a breaking change since CLUSTER:MANAGE implies > > CLUSTER:MANAGE:MEMBER.) > > > > > On Apr 25, 2017, at 2:48 PM, Swapnil Bawaskar <sbawas...@pivotal.io> > > wrote: > > > > > > In our current security model, a user with DATA:MANAGE can create > > regions, > > > create disk stores, WAN gateways etc. I think this is a very wide > scope, > > > because an administrator may want to give create region privilege to a > > > developer, but not necessarily give them the ability to create disk > > stores > > > or send the data in that region over WAN. I propose that we refine the > > > security model to make it finer grained. > > > > > > I propose that Disk, WAN and AsyncQueue be treated as resources in the > > > security framework. These resources will be controlled at the CLUSTER > > > level. As with any other resource, admins will be able to grant READ, > > WRITE > > > and MANAGE permissions to these resources. In terms of shiro, this will > > > take the form: CLUSTER:READ/WRITE/MANAGE:DISK,WAN,ASYNCQUEUE. > > > > > > Here is how it will work out for each resource: > > > DISK > > > 1. CLUSTER:MANAGE:DISK - allows users to create/manage disk stores > > > 2. CLUSTER:WRITE:DISK - allows users to create regions that > > write/overflow > > > to disk stores > > > 3. CLUSTER:READ:DISK - should be covered by DATA:READ, does not make > > sense > > > here > > > > > > WAN: > > > 1. CLUSTER:MANAGE:WAN - allows users to create gateway senders and > > receivers > > > 2. CLUSTER:WRITE:WAN - allows users to create regions that write data > to > > > gateway senders > > > 3. CLUSTER:READ:WAN - allows users to create regions that read data > from > > > gateway receivers > > > > > > We can add other things like functions here as well. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > -- Cheers Jinmei
