+1 to include the fix

On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 8:54 AM Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
wrote:

> The change passed in SSL benchmark testing and can be cherry-picked into
> the release branch.  The Benchmark job as a whole failed due to perf
> degradation with the Security Manager, but that's a different set of tests.
>
>
> On 11/6/19 3:57 PM, Helena Bales wrote:
> > +1 to cherry-picking the fix.
> >
> > The sha hasn't made it to benchmarks yet due to an issue with CI losing
> > resource refs that were needed to keep it moving through the pipeline.
> The
> > next commit is still about an hour away from triggering benchmarks.
> > In my manual benchmarking of this change, I found that it resolved the
> > issue with SSL and passed the benchmarks. Obviously we still need to
> > confirm that it works through the main pipeline, but I feel confident
> that
> > it will pass the benchmark job.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Helena Bales (they/them)
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 9:28 AM Mark Hanson <mhan...@pivotal.io> wrote:
> >
> >> Any other votes? I have 2 people in favor.
> >>
> >> Voting will close at noon.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Mark
> >>
> >>> On Nov 6, 2019, at 8:00 AM, Bruce Schuchardt <bschucha...@pivotal.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>> The fix for this problem is in the CI pipeline today:
> >>
> https://concourse.apachegeode-ci.info/teams/main/pipelines/apache-develop-main/jobs/Build/builds/1341
> >>> On 11/5/19 10:49 AM, Owen Nichols wrote:
> >>>> +1 for bringing this fix to release/1.11.0 (after it has passed
> >> Benchmarks on develop)
> >>>>> On Nov 5, 2019, at 10:45 AM, Bruce Schuchardt <
> bschucha...@pivotal.io>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>> The PR for GEODE-6661 introduced a problem in SSL communications that
> >> needs to be fixed.  It changed SSL handshakes to use a temporary buffer
> >> that's discarded when the handshake completes, but sometimes this buffer
> >> contains application data that must be retained.  This seems to be
> causing
> >> our Benchmark SSL test failures in CI.
> >>>>> I'm preparing a fix.  We can either revert the PR for GEODE-6661 on
> >> that branch or cherry-pick the correction when it's ready.
> >>
>

Reply via email to