In the past (GemFire days) we've had discussions about deprecating
subregions. I'd like to raise the topic again for consideration.

Subregions are merely a way to provide a logical, hierarchical grouping of
regions and don't provide any kind of functionality or behavior which is
inherited or implied.

A similar hierarchy could just as easily be created by using your own
naming conventions. For example, given region* 'A'* as the root, region
*'A_B'* would be the first 'subregion' and *'A_B_C'* could be considered a
'sub-subregion'.

Thoughts? Comments?

--Jens

Reply via email to