Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
I don't particularly care for odd/even designations for
stable/unstable. Maybe that was a coincidence in your example.
I'm not tied to any of the names - it was deliberate but illustrative. I
do think it would be useful for users to be able to tell just from a
jar's name whether it was stable or not.
We can
easily support your scenario and keep w/ standard SVN usage by doing:
geronimo/transaction/branches
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_0
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_2
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_3
geronimo/transaction/tags/2_0
geronimo/transaction/tags/2_3
geronimo/transaction/trunk
The problem I saw with that was how someone would easily check out the
whole tree in order to build from source. I think DB had the same concern.
--
Jeremy
