Re: Module restructure

[Alan D. Cabrera]

David Blevins wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:51 PM: On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 04:38:45PM -0700, Jeremy Boynes wrote: Alan D. Cabrera wrote: Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM: David Blevins wrote: This one ../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction ../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction Why would we have two versions of transaction? I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was keeping it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than "transaction". Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically) .../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction .../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction .../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction .../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction .../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction Oh, I get it. You're just proposing to add the linux kernel odd/even spin on what we have now and dump trunk. Anyone know the lore as to why they went odd even?  Was it the case that the tool that they were using drove them to such an odd nomenclature? Regards, Alan