On May 27, 2005, at 7:46 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:38 PM:
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
Jeremy Boynes wrote, On 5/27/2005 7:26 PM:
David Blevins wrote:
This one
../repos/asf/geronimo/unstable/modules/transaction
../repos/asf/geronimo/stable/modules/transaction
Why would we have two versions of transaction?
I actually think there are going to be additional ones but was
keeping it simple to indicate that "stable" came higher up than
"transaction". Ultimately we might end up with (hypothetically)
.../geronimo/stable/1.0/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/stable/1.2/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/stable/2.0/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/unstable/1.3/modules/transaction
.../geronimo/unstable/2.1/modules/transaction
Where, for example, 1.x is J2EE1.4 requiring JDK1.4 and 2.x is
J2EE1.5 requiring JDK1.5.
I don't particularly care for odd/even designations for stable/
unstable. Maybe that was a coincidence in your example. We can
easily support your scenario and keep w/ standard SVN usage by doing:
geronimo/transaction/branches
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_0
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_2
geronimo/transaction/tags/1_3
geronimo/transaction/tags/2_0
geronimo/transaction/tags/2_3
geronimo/transaction/trunk
The problem here is when you do a co of geronimo/ to get all the
modules, you get a major hose of bits... everything that was ever done.
I hate to say it (and Fitz will prollie flog me with a trout...) but
I can now identify one feature of CVS that I miss...
geir
Regards,
Alan
--
Geir Magnusson Jr +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
