On May 28, 2005, at 2:02 PM, Brian K. Wallace wrote:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dain Sundstrom wrote:
|
|> My questions at the root of this are:
|> ~ 1. Assuming the whole of Geronimo passes the TCK, what can be said of |> a 'minimal' Geronimo? Is it able to claim anything with regard to the
|> TCK?
|
|
| It depends on the specifications the subproject is implementing and if | Sun has a stand-alone tck for the specifications. For example, if it | were the Geronimo 'just a webserver edition' we could certify it for | servlets and jsp because they have standalone tcks, but if it were tx | and jca we could not certify it since there are no standalone tcks for
| those specs.
Understood. My main question was if there was some sort of 'prohibition'
on the use of 'full system' pass/fail statistics for those pieces that
do, in fact, have their own tcks. [I don't view this as a roadblock to
anything, but a definite plus if each individual piece that was able
(due to having and passing their own tcks) could state it passes.]

Yes. If you want to know if the servlet part works on it's own, you need to test it on it's own

geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Reply via email to