On 4/23/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we including ldap in the main distro, or shipping it as a
> plugin?  If it is the latter, we can ship it late if needed.

Great point!  We can even post what we've got today as the 0.92 plugin
and then post a new plugin version later.  (In fact the 0.92 plugin is
on the plugin site already, though we'll want to rebuild it against
the final 1.1 G code when that comes out.)

I guess this means we need to start moving things like directory out
of our main tree so they can be versioned separately.

Thanks,
    Aaron

> On Apr 23, 2006, at 7:15 PM, Jeff Genender wrote:
>
> > If the changes are not huge, I can probably do it.  Alex, are the
> > updates significant?
> >
> > Matt Hogstrom wrote:
> >> Depends.  Since we're focusing on getting the 1.1 release out I'm
> >> not sure we'll have time.  Jeff would have to comment on his
> >> availability to test, etc.
> >> Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >>> You guys have time for the latest RC2 release of Directory?  We
> >>> could push this release for G to get a bunch of fixes and
> >>> performance enhancements in there.
> >>>
> >>> Alex
> >>>
> >>> Jeff Genender wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Yeah, I can take a look.
> >>>>
> >>>> Jeff
> >>>>
> >>>> Aaron Mulder wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> All,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While working on the plugins I found that our Directory is out
> >>>>> of date
> >>>>> (0.9.2 vs latest 0.9.3 on iBiblio).  I also found that if we just
> >>>>> "take the latest of everything Directory-related" it blows up (in
> >>>>> particular, mina 0.9.0 doesn't work, but 0.8.2 appears to).
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Can someone test a good combination of all the Directory-
> >>>>> related libs
> >>>>> and update our etc/project.properties accordingly?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jeff, I think you did the original Directory integration, I'm
> >>>>> not sure
> >>>>> if you want to bite on this.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> It's not a huge deal if we ship G 1.1 a point release of Directory
> >>>>> behind, but it would be nice if we could update.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>     Aaron
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>

Reply via email to