Hi Jules,
Too bad about the line, thanks for trying. Not sure how well this
would work but maybe someone could hop on IRC and take notes and
field questions?
Just a thought.
Looking forward to the summary on the list afterwards.
TTFN,
Bill Dudney
MyFaces - http://myfaces.apache.org
Cayenne - http://incubator.apache.org/projects/cayenne.html
On Jun 28, 2006, at 8:02 AM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
John Sisson wrote:
I'd also be interested in calling in, preferably closer to 9:00pm
if possible.
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?
day=29&month=6&year=2006&p1=78&p2=240&p3=137&p4=179
John
Guys,
Covalent had to commit to a time - we went for 6:00pm on thursday.
I realise that this may be a little earlier than some of you were
hoping for, but it was the best we could do at short notice - sorry.
One further problem. We were not able to organise conferencing
facilities. If anyone thinks that they can work around this,
perhaps via skype or something, I would be happy to try to set
something up - Has anyone run a skype conference with 4 or 5
participants before ? Would you like us to try?
Jules
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt Hogstrom wrote:
I was planning on attending the CeltiXFire BOF at 2100 Dublin
time. 2200 is good from my perspective.
That's a little later than I was hoping for - my worry would be
that people who might otherwise be there will have packed up and
gone home by then.
I would rather a slot somewhere between 6:00pm and 9:00pm...
How does that sound ?
Jules
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Evening you time would be best for me. It looks like there is
an 8 hour time diff between Dublin and California, so anything
after 6pm your time would be good for me (10am here). I can go
maybe an hour earlier, but then I will be sleepy.
-dain
On Jun 27, 2006, at 1:31 PM, Jules Gosnell wrote:
Jeff Genender wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
Are you going to provide a call in line so people not at
the conference can participate?
I'll look into it.
Would anyone be interested in using such a feature ?
I would likely be interested too depending on time.
OK, Jeff - so are there any windows on thurs aft/eve (dublin
time) which would not suit you ? Let us know, so that we can
avoid them.
Jules
Jules
-dain
On Jun 27, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote:
Jules Gosnell wrote:
Matt - I don't think that the problem was with
sponsorship, but rather
exclusion... (maybe I've misunderstood something?).
Covalent are simply
providing a room and beer. The invitation is open to the
entire
community and you will be driving the meeting.
That should be cool. Firstly, it has been announced here in
the
public list. Secondly, you should consider putting up a few
notice signs around ApacheCon to catch interested people who
didn't see this.
Yes, exclusion and lack of openness was the issue. The
sponsorship
was mud in the water. By mentioning this here the issue is
rendered
nonexistent.
Of course, you need to post (here and on those paper
notices) the
details, such as time and place, as soon as they're figured
out.
Thanks, Jules. And thanks for raising this, Matt, so it can be
clarified a bit.
--
#ken P-)}
Ken Coar, Sanagendamgagwedweinini http://Ken.Coar.Org/
Author, developer, opinionist http://Apache-Server.Com/
"Millennium hand and shrimp!"
--"Open Source is a self-assembling organism. You dangle a
piece of
string into a super-saturated solution and a whole operating-
system
crystallises out around it."
/**********************************
* Jules Gosnell
* Partner
* Core Developers Network (Europe)
*
* www.coredevelopers.net
*
* Open Source Training & Support.
**********************************/