On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
I'm looking at the problem.
I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec.
Try the following:
svn co
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0
mvn source:jar javadoc:jar install
The javadoc fails :-( and the source jar does not include the legal
files.
The only way I can think of to include these files is to use the maven
remote resource plugin.
See
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.3/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/JavadocJar.java?revision=556389&view=markup
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-source-plugin-2.0.4/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/source/AbstractSourceJarMojo.java?revision=593233&view=markup
They both include resources that are in the
maven-shared-archive-resources directory, which is the one create by
the remote resource plugin.
I have serious doubts that the previous release were done with maven
(at least for the javadocs and source jars).
Guillaume,
I'm happy to report that I'm able to build the 1.1 version of geronimo-
annotation without a problem.
It's with mixed feelings ;-) that I report that I'm also able to build
the 1.1.1 version of the geronimo-annotation and everything looks good.
What version of maven are you running? I'm running 2.0.7.
--kevan
On Jan 31, 2008 8:40 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Something we overlooked, previously, is
geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/
resources/XMLSchema.dtd
The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should
contain the w3c
license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720
, I
believe) and an attribution in the notice file.
Other than the above, all looks good.
--kevan
Do you think we should cut a new release for this one ?
Yes. Let me know if you'd like me to take a crack at the license/
notice file.
--kevan
