On Jan 31, 2008 4:44 PM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Jan 31, 2008, at 3:03 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I'm looking at the problem. > I can't even re-build the latest release of the annotation spec. > Try the following: > > svn co > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.0 > mvn source:jar javadoc:jar install > > The javadoc fails :-( and the source jar does not include the legal files. > The only way I can think of to include these files is to use the maven > remote resource plugin. > See > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-javadoc-plugin-2.3/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/javadoc/JavadocJar.java?revision=556389&view=markup > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/maven/plugins/tags/maven-source-plugin-2.0.4/src/main/java/org/apache/maven/plugin/source/AbstractSourceJarMojo.java?revision=593233&view=markup > > They both include resources that are in the > maven-shared-archive-resources directory, which is the one create by > the remote resource plugin. > I have serious doubts that the previous release were done with maven > (at least for the javadocs and source jars). > > Guillaume, > I'm happy to report that I'm able to build the 1.1 version of > geronimo-annotation without a problem. > > It's with mixed feelings ;-) that I report that I'm also able to build the > 1.1.1 version of the geronimo-annotation and everything looks good. > > What version of maven are you running? I'm running 2.0.7.
Interesting. I'm using maven 2.0.7. Maybe the version of the plugins used may impact the result too. > > --kevan > > > > On Jan 31, 2008 8:40 AM, Guillaume Nodet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Something we overlooked, previously, is > > geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd > > > > The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c > > license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720, I > > believe) and an attribution in the notice file. > > > > Other than the above, all looks good. > > > > --kevan > > Do you think we should cut a new release for this one ? > Yes. Let me know if you'd like me to take a crack at the license/notice > file. > > --kevan I'll be in vacation and travelling from monday for two weeks, so unfortunately my time will be very limited :-( -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
