Given these legal problems, I'm cancelling all the votes I've started and will start a *single* one for all the specs asap.
On Jan 31, 2008 2:44 AM, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guillaume, > I'm extremely sorry to say that the javadoc and sources jars all seem to be > missing the required license and notice files. > > Not sure what might have changed, build-wise. The previous versions contain > them -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-javadoc.jar and > geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1-sources.jar However, they are missing from > the candidate jars -- geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-javadoc.jar and > geronimo-annotation_1.0_spec-1.1.1-sources.jar > > I sampled additional jars and it seems to be a problem in all of the new > specs. > > Something we overlooked, previously, is > geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec-1.1.1/src/main/resources/javax/servlet/resources/XMLSchema.dtd > > The license/notice file for geronimo-servlet_2.5_spec should contain the w3c > license (http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/copyright-software-19980720, I > believe) and an attribution in the notice file. > > Other than the above, all looks good. > > --kevan -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
