Hey, so now the plugins are doing the trick... yay... thanks David!
But, now I'm wondering, when the server loads, it shows those plugins
loading, which is fine I guess... but I'm wondering if they are eating
up memory or building classpath muck that is never going to be used by
the server (or well, not until we get support for running an rshd
instance in the server).
--jason
On May 14, 2008, at 2:38 PM, David Jencks wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 6:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
Attached patch includes other changes, like moving to jaxb 2.1,
some security changes, ....
I thought I left out the security changes, sorry. Comes from trying
to do too many things at once :-(
Other comments attached to GERONIMO-4013.
I may have been unclear. I wasn't suggesting my initial
GERONIMO-4013 patch was suitable to be committed, but that it might
let us figure out some of the problems with the idea of the car-
maven-plugin including maven transitive dependencies before we broke
everything at once. In particular it looks to me as if the
dependencies for the gshell-* plugins are too all-inclusive and was
wondering what to do about this.
For instance, I have no problem with removing gshell-embeddable, but
would prefer to get the car-maven-plugin working better before
attacking that problem.
thanks
david jencks
-Donald
David Jencks wrote:
I've attached a patch to GERONIMO-4013 that reverses the changes
from 4012 and change the car-maven-plugin to optionally follow
transitive dependencies. I think if you apply my patch you won't
be using the gshell-* plugins. I had to make a couple other minor
build changes to get the build to complete. The server builds and
shows signs of starting -- on my copy it runs into some problems
with unrelated changes to the security system I'm working on.
Jason, can you check the generated dependencies in the gshell-*
plugins to see if they look remotely plausible or can be nudged
closer to plausible?
thanks
david jencks
On May 13, 2008, at 11:55 AM, David Jencks wrote:
I talked with jason a bit on irc and we're doing an experiment
with optionally including transitive dependencies using the car-
maven-plugin. Hopefully this will work and avoid the duplication
jason is leery of. Please don't commit duplication until we find
out if this works or not.
AFAICT this isn't a bug fix but rather new development so I'm
unclear about why you are thinking of including this in 2.1.2?
thanks
david jencks
On May 13, 2008, at 11:32 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
I started with your new framework/configs/gshell-* code, updated
gshell-framework to include all the individual depends so we
don't need gshell-embeddable, updated server/pom.xml with the
new depends and updated boilerplate with the new gshell-geronimo
car depend and it looks promising. I'm still exercising some of
the gsh commands, but so far help, geronimo/start-server, deploy/
connect and geronimo/stop-server are working....
If all looks well after a few more tests, I'll commit the
changes into trunk for everyone to review before we spend the
time pulling it into 2.1.2.
-Donald
Jason Dillon wrote:
On May 13, 2008, at 1:14 AM, David Jencks wrote:
So including the dependencies you need for gshell in the
boilerplate's pom would get them into the geronimo repo. As I
said transitive dependencies don't result in inclusion at the
moment for rather good reasons. I don't know what the
<include> tag would do but it's probably worth investigating.
What <include> tag are you talking about?
I guess I'm gonna try to make plugins for the gshell
dependencies, these 3:
gshell-framework - just the core bits required to make gshell
work
gshell-geronimo - our additional commands to work with the
server + their deps
gshell-remote - the remote/whisper commands
I must say I'm really quite frustrated at the lack of
transitive dependency support here. As this means that alot of
the dependencyManagement configuration which is already in the
GShell poms need to be duplicated into the Geronimo poms,
making version management even more of a nightmare.
:-(
Well, I started to add these cars to framework/configs, but I
must admit I really am clueless for how this stuff works now.
:-(
--jason