I tried changing it locally and it doesn't work- gets overridden by
pluto.css (firebug confirms that)
If label wasn't used anywhere until now we can modify pluto.css. Why is it
there anyway?

On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 8:45 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Joe Bohn wrote:
>
>> Joe Bohn wrote:
>>
>>> Shrey Banga wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think that can be done because pluto.css is loaded after
>>>> main.css and it'll override any previous css styles for label.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I'm not sure about what the correct processing is supposed to be for the
>>> style sheets ... but I made the change locally to add in a label entry in
>>> main.css without the float:left and it resolved the problem for me. I can go
>>> ahead and check this in if you'd like.  In general I don't like duplication
>>> but I like have most if not all of the settings we care about in one place.
>>>
>>
>> Oops ... I just realized that I made the changes in branches/2.1 (which
>> I'm not even sure ever exhibited the problem).  So my test may be invalid.
>>  Also, it may not be that hot of an issue for 2.1.2 ... for some reason I
>> forgot that the issues were were seeing were in trunk. :-)  I'm checking the
>> change out on trunk now ... will let you know the results soon.
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
> Grrr .... I rebuilt too much in trunk, picked up the latest (just
> published) snapshots of openejb .... and now I can't even get the server to
> start (MEJB issues).  I guess I won't be able to check out the change in
> main vs. pluto.css very soon.
>
> My level of concern is much lower anyway now that I am recalled this is not
> an issue for 2.1.2 (at least not yet).
>
>
> Joe
>
>
>
>>
>>
>>> Joe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 6:55 PM, Joe Bohn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:
>>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>    YunFeng Ma wrote:
>>>>
>>>>        I tested the console in FireFox 2.x and IE 6.x after removing
>>>>        label tag in pluto.css and didn't see any problem. I prefer to
>>>>        remove it before G v2.1.2 is out of the door.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>    I agree we want this fixed before we ship 2.1.2. <http://2.1.2.>
>>>>     However, I'm not sure modifying pluto.css is the best way to go.
>>>>     All of our style sheet changes for the console have typically been
>>>>    restricted to main.css.  I think pluto.css is pretty much a direct
>>>>    copy from pluto.  It might be easier to maintain if we continue to
>>>>    keep our changes limited to main.css.  Can you try fixing this by
>>>>    adding a new label entry in main.css without float:left?
>>>>
>>>>    Joe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>        -- Yun Feng
>>>>
>>>>        Shrey Banga wrote:
>>>>         > I've opened a JIRA (GERONIMO-4204) for this issue. I need to
>>>>        know if the
>>>>         > float:left for labels in pluto.css is needed and where because
>>>> it
>>>>         > affects all Admin Console portlets.
>>>>         >
>>>>         > On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Shrey Banga
>>>>        <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>         > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >     After rebuilding the server I too faced the same problem
>>>>        and on
>>>>         >     further inspection I could make out the problem was
>>>>        because the
>>>>         >     patch GERONIMO-4081 Accessibility issues (at revision:
>>>>        675083) has
>>>>         >     surrounded text by <label> tags, which have a float:left
>>>>        property
>>>>         >     set in pluto.css which I suppose is causing the problems.
>>>>        I'm not
>>>>         >     sure why the float:left is needed in the first place but
>>>>        in case
>>>>         >     removing it isn't possible, we could create a separate
>>>>        css for the
>>>>         >     console and import it in the affected portlets.
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >     On Fri, Jul 11, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Joe Bohn
>>>>        <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>         >     <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>> wrote:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >         In addition to that quirk, there are other layout
>>>>        issues I'm
>>>>         >         seeing too (these are probably the ones Jarek was
>>>>        seeing).
>>>>         >
>>>>         >         For example:
>>>>         >         - Server Log Viewer layout is all messed up
>>>>         >         - All of the Applications views (WARs, EARs, etc...)
>>>>        have the
>>>>         >         layout all messed up
>>>>         >         - Plugin portlets layout is messed up
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >         Those are just a few that I noticed clicking on the
>>>>        top level
>>>>         >         portlet pages.  There may be other problems when you
>>>>        drill down
>>>>         >         into some of the pages to alternate jsps.
>>>>         >
>>>>         >         Joe
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >         Joe Bohn wrote:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >             I'm seeing strange things in trunk as well.
>>>>         Using firefox
>>>>         >             on a tomcat image I see the following prior to
>>>>        the banner in
>>>>         >             the console.  I don't see this in safari:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >             Skip to navigation
>>>>         >             Skip to main content
>>>>         >
>>>>         >             The access keys for this page are:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                * ALT plus 1 skips to navigation.
>>>>         >                * ALT plus 2 skips to main content.
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >             The first two are links to anchors in the page.
>>>>         If I reload
>>>>         >             the page the extra content prior to the banner is
>>>>        no longer
>>>>         >             displayed and things look normal again.
>>>>         >
>>>>         >             Joe
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >             Shiva Kumar H R wrote:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                 I have been committing some patches in Admin
>>>>        Console,
>>>>         >                 but most of them have been local to Plan
>>>> Creator
>>>>         >                 portlet. On the server that's built on my
>>>>        machine (which
>>>>         >                 has all the commits I have done so far +
>>>>        trunk code as
>>>>         >                 on 26-Jun), the portlets that you mention
>>>>        (Web App WARs,
>>>>         >                 Deploy New,  Plugins, Server Logs) seem to be
>>>>        working
>>>>         >                 fine (I tested using IE 6 & Firefox 3).
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                 I will update my trunk and do a clean build,
>>>>        and see if
>>>>         >                 I face any problems.
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                 On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:59 PM, Jarek Gawor
>>>>         >                 <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
>>>>         >                 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>        <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>>> wrote:
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                    Hi,
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                    I just built the latest code tried to use
>>>>        the admin
>>>>         >                 console and the
>>>>         >                    layout in a few places (e.g. Web App WARs,
>>>>        Deploy
>>>>         >                 New,  Plugins,
>>>>         >                    Server Logs) is screwed up. I see similar
>>>>        layout
>>>>         >                 issues on Firefox
>>>>         >                    (2.0) and IE.
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                    It does not seem like people are checking
>>>>        how things
>>>>         >                 look in the
>>>>         >                    console before committing the patches...
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                    Jarek
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >                 --
>>>>         >                 Thanks,
>>>>         >                 Shiva
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >     --
>>>>         >     Shrey Banga
>>>>         >     Bachelor of Technology, III year
>>>>         >     Department of Electrical Engineering
>>>>         >     Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         >
>>>>         > --
>>>>         > Shrey Banga
>>>>         > Bachelor of Technology, III year
>>>>         > Department of Electrical Engineering
>>>>         > Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Shrey Banga
>>>> Bachelor of Technology, III year
>>>> Department of Electrical Engineering
>>>> Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Shrey Banga
Bachelor of Technology, III year
Department of Electrical Engineering
Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee

Reply via email to