On Jun 8, 2011, at 9:36 PM, David Blevins wrote: > I and pretty much everyone with dual OpenEJB/Geronimo commit is likely way > too busy to commit this patch (XBEAN-176).
Ended up having to make CDI related change to xbean and cleared out this patch. We should still consider opening things up though. > > I wonder in general if we shouldn't just open up the xbean section of the > repo since it is more or less a commons area. Would be nice to open it up to > at least OpenEJB. I.e. we just tweak the svn auth file like so: > > [/geronimo/xbean/] > @geronimo = rw > @openejb = rw > > Could potentially open it to OpenWebBeans at some point later if it starts > using xbean-finder. So far talk on the OWB side has always been "lets move > everything commons" which I suppose we could do, but that seems like a lot of > pointless refactoring and repackaging and moving when we could just add a > couple lines to the svn auth file. > > Thoughts? > > > -David > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> >> Date: June 7, 2011 10:22:22 PM PDT >> To: d...@openejb.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Jar listing performance >> Reply-To: d...@openejb.apache.org >> >> In fact there are 2 kind of API for Jar/Zip: the ZipFile and the >> ZipInputStream (same for jars). If you use the inpout stream one ... you use >> an input stream so you read everything. If you use the file one you directly >> call native methods so under linux in particular it works better (i didn't >> test under windows but i hope it is the same). >> >> David said me we are using JarArchive: >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XBEAN-176 >> >> - Romain >> >> 2011/6/8 David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com> >> >>> FYI, to Romain, regarding http://www.friendpaste.com/JU7WuKslKle9UaAL3r21M >>> >>> There might be caching going on in the first call that makes the second >>> call go faster. We should check that angle. Maybe switch the order or loop >>> the main code a couple times. >>> >>> -David >>> >>> >>> >
