I think we'll re-release jms next month anyway so not blocking (others) IMO
Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2015-02-10 17:48 GMT+01:00 John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org>: > -1 (non binding) > > Martyn has a few fixes that he raised a PR for about JMS 2. > https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3 > > It also looks like you already pushed the release to scm. > > John > > > On Mon Feb 09 2015 at 2:21:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hello guys, >> >> As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7 >> spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes >> (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too >> much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small >> blocking bugs fixed since weeks on SNAPSHOTs. Also note this release >> train was mainly motivated by AMQ which is waiting JMS 2 API to >> release their version 6 (thanks to John D Ament for the patch on the >> API BTW). >> >> Here is the list of artifacts included in this vote: >> >> - geronimo-javamail_1.4 + geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail + >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider >> - geronimo-ejb_3.2_spec >> - geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec >> - geronimo-jaxrs_2.0_spec >> - geronimo-jms_2.0_spec >> - geronimo-jta_1.2_spec >> >> >> Here is the staging repo >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1012 >> >> I bet you will find the source/javadoc/etc yourself. >> >> My key can be found at >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS >> >> please VOTE >> [+1] all fine, ship it >> [+0] don't care >> [-1] stop, because ${reason} >> >> here is my +1 >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau
