+1 (binding). Go on. It's just an -alpha release. We had that glitch already in the previous version. Just make sure it properly gets committed in time. If you don't have sufficient privileges to commit it yourself then just ping on the list for a review and apply.
LieGrue, strub On Wednesday, 11 February 2015, 11:28, Martyn Taylor <mtay...@redhat.com> wrote: > > >-1 (non-binding). There are a few issues with the JMS spec jar. There >is a PR open here: https://github.com/apache/geronimo-specs/pull/3 > > >On 09/02/15 19:20, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: >> Hello guys, >> >> As announced few weeks ago let's try to release more alpha of our EE 7 >> spec jars. I added javamail as well since it got some nice fixes >> (thanks Hendrik mainly) which are important to release since I saw too >> much people replacing our implementation by javax one for small >> blocking bugs fixed since weeks on SNAPSHOTs. Also note this release >> train was mainly motivated by AMQ which is waiting JMS 2 API to >> release their version 6 (thanks to John D Ament for the patch on the >> API BTW). >> >> Here is the list of artifacts included in this vote: >> >> - geronimo-javamail_1.4 + geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail + >> geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider >> - geronimo-ejb_3.2_spec >> - geronimo-javamail_1.4_spec >> - geronimo-jaxrs_2.0_spec >> - geronimo-jms_2.0_spec >> - geronimo-jta_1.2_spec >> >> >> Here is the staging repo >> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1012 >> >> I bet you will find the source/javadoc/etc yourself. >> >> My key can be found at >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS >> >> please VOTE >> [+1] all fine, ship it >> [+0] don't care >> [-1] stop, because ${reason} >> >> here is my +1 >> >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau >> http://www.tomitribe.com >> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com >> https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > >
