[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1921?focusedWorklogId=883191&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-883191
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-1921:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 03/Oct/23 18:10
Start Date: 03/Oct/23 18:10
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: umustafi commented on code in PR #3790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3790#discussion_r1344526938
##########
gobblin-runtime/src/main/java/org/apache/gobblin/runtime/api/MysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.java:
##########
@@ -287,19 +290,19 @@ else if (leaseValidityStatus == 2) {
// Use our event to acquire lease, check for previous db
eventTimestamp and leaseAcquisitionTimestamp
int numRowsUpdated =
attemptLeaseIfExistingRow(thisTableAcquireLeaseIfMatchingAllStatement,
flowAction,
true,true, dbEventTimestamp, dbLeaseAcquisitionTimestamp);
- return evaluateStatusAfterLeaseAttempt(numRowsUpdated, flowAction,
Optional.of(dbCurrentTimestamp));
+ return evaluateStatusAfterLeaseAttempt(numRowsUpdated, flowAction,
Optional.of(dbCurrentTimestamp), isReminderEvent);
} // No longer leasing this event
if (isWithinEpsilon) {
- log.debug("tryAcquireLease for [{}, eventTimestamp: {}] - CASE 5:
Same event, no longer leasing event in db: "
- + "terminate", flowAction, dbCurrentTimestamp.getTime());
+ log.debug("tryAcquireLease for [{}, is: {}, eventTimestamp: {}] -
CASE 5: Same event, no longer leasing event"
+ + " in db", flowAction, isReminderEvent ? "reminder" :
"original", dbCurrentTimestamp.getTime());
Review Comment:
Yes I intentionally removed the word bc i noticed the other log statements
only describe the case not the action that follows
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 883191)
Time Spent: 3h (was: 2h 50m)
> Properly handle reminder events
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: GOBBLIN-1921
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1921
> Project: Apache Gobblin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: gobblin-service
> Reporter: Urmi Mustafi
> Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 3h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Reminder flow trigger events were being improperly handled and interpreted as
> new events because they are triggered {{linger}} time after the original
> trigger where {{epsilon < linger}} and we use {{epsilon}} to determine event
> distinctness. With reminder events being considered distinct events, we were
> launching excess concurrent flows that were then being cancelled. Now we
> handle reminder events differently from normal event triggers to ensure
> they're properly evaluated. Because of db laundering, reminder events are
> easy to handle - if they're older than the currently worked upon event in the
> database they can be skipped and if they're equal to the current event in the
> database they are handled like normal. Reminder events should never be newer
> than the current event in the lease arbiter table because db laundering
> always results in increasing event times.Â
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)