[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1921?focusedWorklogId=882999&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-882999
 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-1921:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 02/Oct/23 21:14
            Start Date: 02/Oct/23 21:14
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: umustafi commented on code in PR #3790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3790#discussion_r1343170550


##########
gobblin-runtime/src/test/java/org/apache/gobblin/runtime/api/MysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiterTest.java:
##########
@@ -141,14 +142,14 @@ public void testAcquireLeaseSingleParticipant() throws 
Exception {
     
Assert.assertTrue(mysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.recordLeaseSuccess(fourthObtainedStatus));
     Assert.assertTrue(System.currentTimeMillis() - 
fourthObtainedStatus.getEventTimestamp() < EPSILON);
     MultiActiveLeaseArbiter.LeaseAttemptStatus fifthLaunchStatus =
-        mysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.tryAcquireLease(launchDagAction, 
eventTimeMillis);
+        mysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.tryAcquireLease(launchDagAction, 
eventTimeMillis, false);
     Assert.assertTrue(fifthLaunchStatus instanceof 
MultiActiveLeaseArbiter.NoLongerLeasingStatus);
 
     // Tests CASE 6 of no longer leasing a distinct event in DB
     // Wait so this event is considered distinct and a new lease will be 
acquired
     Thread.sleep(EPSILON * 3/2);
     MultiActiveLeaseArbiter.LeaseAttemptStatus sixthLaunchStatus =
-        mysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.tryAcquireLease(launchDagAction, 
eventTimeMillis);
+        mysqlMultiActiveLeaseArbiter.tryAcquireLease(launchDagAction, 
eventTimeMillis, false);

Review Comment:
   Added all these test cases now (were still in progress before).





Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

    Worklog Id:     (was: 882999)
    Time Spent: 1.5h  (was: 1h 20m)

> Properly handle reminder events
> -------------------------------
>
>                 Key: GOBBLIN-1921
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1921
>             Project: Apache Gobblin
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: gobblin-service
>            Reporter: Urmi Mustafi
>            Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 1.5h
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Reminder flow trigger events were being improperly handled and interpreted as 
> new events because they are triggered {{linger}} time after the original 
> trigger where {{epsilon < linger}} and we use {{epsilon}} to determine event 
> distinctness. With reminder events being considered distinct events, we were 
> launching excess concurrent flows that were then being cancelled. Now we 
> handle reminder events differently from normal event triggers to ensure 
> they're properly evaluated. Because of db laundering, reminder events are 
> easy to handle - if they're older than the currently worked upon event in the 
> database they can be skipped and if they're equal to the current event in the 
> database they are handled like normal. Reminder events should never be newer 
> than the current event in the lease arbiter table because db laundering 
> always results in increasing event times. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)

Reply via email to