[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1921?focusedWorklogId=883001&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-883001
]
ASF GitHub Bot logged work on GOBBLIN-1921:
-------------------------------------------
Author: ASF GitHub Bot
Created on: 02/Oct/23 21:15
Start Date: 02/Oct/23 21:15
Worklog Time Spent: 10m
Work Description: umustafi commented on code in PR #3790:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gobblin/pull/3790#discussion_r1343171465
##########
gobblin-service/src/test/java/org/apache/gobblin/service/modules/orchestration/OrchestratorTest.java:
##########
@@ -341,13 +341,13 @@ public void doNotRegisterMetricsAdhocFlows() throws
Exception {
flowProps.put("gobblin.flow.destinationIdentifier", "destination");
flowProps.put("flow.allowConcurrentExecution", false);
FlowSpec adhocSpec = new FlowSpec(URI.create("flow0/group0"), "1", "",
ConfigUtils.propertiesToConfig(flowProps) , flowProps, Optional.absent(),
Optional.absent());
- this.orchestrator.orchestrate(adhocSpec, flowProps, 0);
+ this.orchestrator.orchestrate(adhocSpec, flowProps, 0, false);
String metricName =
MetricRegistry.name(ServiceMetricNames.GOBBLIN_SERVICE_PREFIX, "group0",
"flow0", ServiceMetricNames.COMPILED);
Assert.assertNull(metricContext.getParent().get().getGauges().get(metricName));
flowProps.setProperty("job.schedule", "0/2 * * * * ?");
FlowSpec scheduledSpec = new FlowSpec(URI.create("flow0/group0"), "1", "",
ConfigUtils.propertiesToConfig(flowProps) , flowProps, Optional.absent(),
Optional.absent());
- this.orchestrator.orchestrate(scheduledSpec, flowProps, 0);
+ this.orchestrator.orchestrate(scheduledSpec, flowProps, 0, false);
Review Comment:
I'm not really testing the orchestrate function with reminder true but
rather the unit test would be testing the `tryAcquireLease` part. See tests I
added.
Issue Time Tracking
-------------------
Worklog Id: (was: 883001)
Time Spent: 1h 50m (was: 1h 40m)
> Properly handle reminder events
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: GOBBLIN-1921
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOBBLIN-1921
> Project: Apache Gobblin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: gobblin-service
> Reporter: Urmi Mustafi
> Assignee: Abhishek Tiwari
> Priority: Major
> Time Spent: 1h 50m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Reminder flow trigger events were being improperly handled and interpreted as
> new events because they are triggered {{linger}} time after the original
> trigger where {{epsilon < linger}} and we use {{epsilon}} to determine event
> distinctness. With reminder events being considered distinct events, we were
> launching excess concurrent flows that were then being cancelled. Now we
> handle reminder events differently from normal event triggers to ensure
> they're properly evaluated. Because of db laundering, reminder events are
> easy to handle - if they're older than the currently worked upon event in the
> database they can be skipped and if they're equal to the current event in the
> database they are handled like normal. Reminder events should never be newer
> than the current event in the lease arbiter table because db laundering
> always results in increasing event times.Â
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)