Steve Appling wrote:
I would love to change this name. I did not come from an Ivy background
and have always felt this was awkward.
I have also always felt that using configurations to store paths and to
specify a distribution archive were two very different uses that didn't
belong together. I would like to see the archive part pulled out into
another concept.
To me, the core of configurations are named dependencies. I like:
Changed my mind :) I think I like this better:
dependencySets {
compile
openAPI
}
dependencies {
compile 'commons-io:commons-io:1.4'
}
I think "paths" are a little too generic. And paths.compile.asPath
seems a little strange :)
Hans Dockter wrote:
I would love to have a better name for configurations. Initially I
just took this name from Ivy as I couldn't think of anything better.
Even with Ivy I guess it is not a perfect name. But in the context of
a build system it is really confusing.
Mostly configurations are classpaths, but not always (e.g. they may
contain distribution archives). Why not calling configurations paths?
paths {
compile "commons-io:commons-io:1.4"
}
paths.compile.files ...
Thoughts? Better names?
I know that this would be a pretty disruptive change. It would have
been much better to have done this earlier. But that's why we are
still pre 1.0.
- Hans
--
Hans Dockter
Gradle Project Manager
http://www.gradle.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
--
Steve Appling
Automated Logic Research Team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit:
http://xircles.codehaus.org/manage_email
