On Tue, 2017-01-17 at 10:04 +0100, Cédric Champeau wrote: > My take is simpler than this. If Parrot should be included in 2.5, > then > remove the old parser and use it. If it's for 3.0, then it should not > belong to the 2.5 beta, or it should be an external dependency > (possibly > tested by adding a jar manually).
Agreed. Then the question is whether a new parser is a minor change or a major change and whether 2.4 → 2.5 is a minor change or a major change. The 2.5 build still creates jars and indy jars. Isn't it about time we settle this so there are only one set of jars in a build? -- Russel. ============================================================================= Dr Russel Winder t: +44 20 7585 2200 voip: sip:russel.win...@ekiga.net 41 Buckmaster Road m: +44 7770 465 077 xmpp: rus...@winder.org.uk London SW11 1EN, UK w: www.russel.org.uk skype: russel_winder
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
