The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows + server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run Dacapo under x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range (10-20 % slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration.
Thanks, Vladimir. On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate performance of about 35% of whatever he's measuring against. geir Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: >>> >>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >>>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote: >>>> >>>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :) >>>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads. >>>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly >>>> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or >>>> sun6), >>>> bea5 is around 80% and ibm5 is around 70%, I'll have more detailed >>>> results shortly. >>> I don't understand this at all. It wasn't but a few weeks ago when >>> someone was reporting decapo numbers that ranged from 90% of Sun5 to >>> 110% of Sun5. >> >> on x86_64? > > That's true. It was x86. > > But the numbers that Robin is reporting aren't great either, are they? > > geir > >>
