On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun wrote: > The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows + > server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run Dacapo under > x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range (10-20 % > slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration.
And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess? :) Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons of *different platforms* in one place? That should help to avoid major differences in our visions for harmony performance. * Melody * marmonytest.org * Robin's site * wiki (just for the start, maybe) > Thanks, > Vladimir. > > On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate > > performance of about 35% of whatever he's measuring against. > > > > geir > > > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > >>> > > >>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > >>>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :) > > >>>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads. > > >>>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are constantly > > >>>> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or > > >>>> sun6), > > >>>> bea5 is around 80% and ibm5 is around 70%, I'll have more detailed > > >>>> results shortly. > > >>> I don't understand this at all. It wasn't but a few weeks ago when > > >>> someone was reporting decapo numbers that ranged from 90% of Sun5 to > > >>> 110% of Sun5. > > >> > > >> on x86_64? > > > > > > That's true. It was x86. > > > > > > But the numbers that Robin is reporting aren't great either, are they? > > > > > > geir > > > > > >> > > > -- Egor Pasko
