On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Alexey Petrenko wrote: > 2006/11/23, Vladimir Strigun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On 23 Nov 2006 14:37:09 +0600, Egor Pasko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On the 0x22A day of Apache Harmony Vladimir Strigun wrote: > > > > The numbers that I published was received on P4 under Windows + > > > > server.emconf +Harmony-1980. Unfortunately I haven't run Dacapo under > > > > x86_64, but I hope we could receive almost the same range (10-20 % > > > > slower that Sun) with the mentioned configuration. > > > > > > And Sun was running with "-server" too I guess? :) > > > > Yes, of course. > > > > > Maybe, it is time to track performance comparisons of *different > > > platforms* in one place? That should help to avoid major differences in > > > our visions for harmony performance. > > > > Yes, good idea. Should we define the configuration for all VM's as well? > > For instance, for Sun we could use parameters from spec site. What do > > you think about it? > +1 for options from spec site.
I am in love with it too. We could present results similar to how spec.org does. Just a list of runs. For each: * revision number * hardware/os summary (number of cores) * link to full details * more? that would be great if we had volunteers on this, to avoid performance confusions :) > > > * Melody > > > * marmonytest.org > > > * Robin's site > > > * wiki (just for the start, maybe) > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > Vladimir. > > > > > > > > On 11/23/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I reviewed - looks like Robin is seeing DRLVM get an aggregate > > > > > performance of about 35% of whatever he's measuring against. > > > > > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > > >> Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > > > > >>>> Sergey Kuksenko wrote: > > > > > >>>> > > > > > >>>>> Lets do the simplest thing fist. :) > > > > > >>>>> We can do it. We only need to specify a set of workloads. > > > > > >>>> I've tried running dacapo with 10 warming stages and we are > > > > > >>>> constantly > > > > > >>>> around 25% speed against the leading JVM (which is always sun5 or > > > > > >>>> sun6), > > > > > >>>> bea5 is around 80% and ibm5 is around 70%, I'll have more > > > > > >>>> detailed > > > > > >>>> results shortly. > > > > > >>> I don't understand this at all. It wasn't but a few weeks ago > > > > > >>> when > > > > > >>> someone was reporting decapo numbers that ranged from 90% of Sun5 > > > > > >>> to > > > > > >>> 110% of Sun5. > > > > > >> > > > > > >> on x86_64? > > > > > > > > > > > > That's true. It was x86. > > > > > > > > > > > > But the numbers that Robin is reporting aren't great either, are > > > > > > they? > > > > > > > > > > > > geir > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Egor Pasko > > > > > > > > > -- Egor Pasko
