Andrew Zhang 写道:
On 11/27/06, Nathan Beyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
I don't have a problem with these timelines. I think we probably need
to start formalizing these plans a bit more. Perhaps set a target for
a release candidate release of May. Also, I think this coincides
nicely with establishing our branching/tagging policy (branch for JDK
5, trunk for JDK 6 and tags for each release, etc).
Branching/tagging sounds great! so that people can start contribuiting
right
away if they're interested in jdk6. :)
+100.
And I am interested in implementing J2SE 6 new feature.
Best regards
-Nathan
On 11/26/06, Geir Magnusson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed that I've said the following several times, and it's really
> not for me to say, but for us to say.
>
> Does anyone have a problem with the following "high-level" time line?
>
>
>
> Mid 2007 : Java SE 5
>
> End 2007 : Java SE 6 (meaning we have to start thinking about Java
SE 6
> classlib changes...)
>
> End 2008 : Java SE 7 (this really means "we'll do Java SE 7 when Sun
> does Java SE 7...")
>
>
>
> geir
>
