Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this
contribution and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to
officially accept the contribution.
[ ] +1 Accept this contribution
[ ] -1 Reject this contribution because...
I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time.
Regards,
Oliver
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Hi all,
A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch
so that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java
releases. We began working in that mirror because it was convenient
for our internal builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made
back into Harmony as we went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and
releases came and went those plans did not come into fruition - until
now :)
I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP
agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187
[1] for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following
enhancements:
- A large number of bug fixes.
- Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC
32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64.
- As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been
removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries.
- JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of
non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs.
- Significant performance improvements.
All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to
be done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd
rather do that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let
me know if there are any objections/comments to this contribution!
I'll give it a few days and then start a vote.
Regards,
Oliver
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187
+1
--
Best Regards,
Regis.
