+1 from me.
2009/5/12, Kevin Zhou <zhoukevi...@gmail.com>: > +1 > That's great. > > On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Regis <xu.re...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Oliver Deakin wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this >>> contribution >>> and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to officially >>> accept >>> the contribution. >>> >>> [ ] +1 Accept this contribution >>> [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because... >>> >>> I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Oliver >>> >>> >>> Oliver Deakin wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch >>>> so >>>> that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java releases. We >>>> began working in that mirror because it was convenient for our internal >>>> builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made back into Harmony as >>>> we >>>> went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and releases came and went >>>> those >>>> plans did not come into fruition - until now :) >>>> >>>> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP >>>> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187 >>>> [1] >>>> for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following >>>> enhancements: >>>> - A large number of bug fixes. >>>> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC >>>> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64. >>>> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been >>>> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries. >>>> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of >>>> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs. >>>> - Significant performance improvements. >>>> >>>> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to >>>> be >>>> done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd rather >>>> do >>>> that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let me know if >>>> there >>>> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few >>>> days >>>> and then start a vote. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Oliver >>>> >>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> +1 >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> Regis. >> >
