+1 On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Sian January <sianjanu...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> +1 > > 2009/5/11 Oliver Deakin <oliver.dea...@googlemail.com>: > > Hi all, > > > > It's been a week since I sent out the initial mail about this > contribution > > and opinion seems positive so I'd like to open a vote to officially > accept > > the contribution. > > > > [ ] +1 Accept this contribution > > [ ] -1 Reject this contribution because... > > > > I'll conclude the vote in 3 days as usual, unless anyone needs more time. > > > > Regards, > > Oliver > > > > > > Oliver Deakin wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> A little while ago, IBM created a mirror of the Java 6 jdktools branch > so > >> that we could start bringing Harmony JDWP into the IBM Java releases. We > >> began working in that mirror because it was convenient for our internal > >> builds, with a plan to reflect all changes we made back into Harmony as > we > >> went. Unfortunately, as deadlines drew in and releases came and went > those > >> plans did not come into fruition - until now :) > >> > >> I'd like to announce the contribution of an enhanced Java 6 level JDWP > >> agent and socket transport layer. It has been attached to HARMONY-6187 > [1] > >> for everyone to try out - please take a look. It has the following > >> enhancements: > >> - A large number of bug fixes. > >> - Ported to a wide variety of platforms - Linux x86/x86_64, Linux PPC > >> 32/64, zLinux 31/64, Windows x86/x86_64, AIX PPC 32/64 and zOS 31/64. > >> - As part of the porting process, all non-portable C++ usage has been > >> removed and rewritten, particularly use of C++ standard libraries. > >> - JSR 45 support implemented. The new JDWP agent allows debugging of > >> non-Java stratum code running on the VM, for example JSPs. > >> - Significant performance improvements. > >> > >> All authors already have ACQs recorded. There may be some more work to > be > >> done to get the new JDWP functioning 100% with Harmony, but I'd rather > do > >> that work out in the open once it is committed. Please let me know if > there > >> are any objections/comments to this contribution! I'll give it a few > days > >> and then start a vote. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Oliver > >> > >> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-6187 > >> > >> > > > > -- > > Oliver Deakin > > Unless stated otherwise above: > > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > > 741598. Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, > Hampshire > > PO6 3AU > > > > > > > > -- > Unless stated otherwise above: > IBM United Kingdom Limited - Registered in England and Wales with number > 741598. > Registered office: PO Box 41, North Harbour, Portsmouth, Hampshire PO6 3AU > -- With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями, Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов, http://www.telecom-express.ru/ http://people.apache.org/~aaf/ http://harmony.apache.org/ http://code.google.com/p/openmeetings/
