В Sat, 29/10/2011 в 16:49 +0100, Tim Ellison пишет: > On 29/10/2011 15:59, Gregory Shimansky wrote: > > В Сбт, 29/10/2011 в 15:55 +0200, Christian Grobmeier пишет: > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 3:21 PM, Jochen Theodorou <blackd...@gmx.org> > >> wrote: > >>> Am 29.10.2011 14:53, schrieb Tim Ellison: > >>>> On 29/10/2011 10:13, Matthias Wessendorf wrote: > >>>>> Sounds right... Too sad to see this happening. > >>>>> Will the code remain in an svn repo? I don't see much in the attic svn > >>>>> repo. > >>>> > >>>> The process is described here [1]. The Harmony SVN will be marked > >>>> read-only, so anyone can still obtain the code to use under the usual > >>>> Apache terms. We would not allow any commits as that requires an active > >>>> PMC to provide the oversight of the incoming changes. > >>>> > >>>> [1] http://attic.apache.org/process > >>> > >>> are there still people willing to commit to the project? > >> > >> It doesn't seem so: > >> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/harmony/?root=Apache-SVN > >> > >> last commit ist 3 month old. > >> > >> Its a shame this project goes to the attic. I would prefer to see > >> Harmony become an alternative to Java. But as long as there are no > >> people showing interest in doing so, the attic is its place. > > > > I wonder if anyone contacted Oracle about JCK after Sun was acquired by > > them. Absence of JCK was the main reason why Harmony lost its support > > IMHO. > > I'm surprised you missed the reporting, and subsequent Apache withdrawal > from the JCP etc. > > For example, see > http://markmail.org/message/rqyg4sdybsd35xgg > https://blogs.apache.org/foundation/search?q=harmony > > http://apache.org/foundation/records/minutes/2010/board_minutes_2010_10_20.txt > and various press articles.
Right. I recall this now. Then +1 for the Attic. > > Regards, > Tim > > >> Attic projects can have a revival, if things change. > >> > >> Cheers > > > > > >
