Stack do you have latency graph during the time the RS and HMaster were down? (did you see a big variance in latency)? BTW this test is a MR/scan test or you also have update and delete?
Thanks Mikael.S On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:15 AM, Stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote: > On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 4:26 PM, lars hofhansl <lhofha...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > The third 0.94.0 RC is available for download here: > http://people.apache.org/~larsh/hbase-0.94.0-rc3/ > > (My gpg key is available from pgp.mit.edu. Key id: 7CA45750) > > > > I'm +1 on this RC going out as 0.94.0. On the hadoop 2.0.0 issues, > I'm w/ Andy that we can fix in a point release. > > I loaded a small cluster of 5 nodes running the tip of 0.92 branch > with 10B rows using the goraci tool (so via gora). I verified that > there no dangling references with the goraci Verify step. I then > killed the master and stood up the 0.94.0rc3 master and reran the > Verify step (a full scan of the table). Did some other poking around > to make sure all was good w/ a 0.94.0 master in a 0.92 cluster. I > killed a regionserver and brought up a 0.94.0 and made sure all was > good. I stopped the cluster and brought it all up 0.94.0. I'd left a > Verify running during the restart and the MR job completed anyways. > The Verify step on a clean 0.94.0, a big scan, seems to have run to > completion in about 15% less time than did 0.92. I checked out the > logs. Nothing untoward. > > St.Ack >