Hi We (it includes the test team here) 0.94 RC and carried out various operations on it. Puts, Scans, and all the restart scenarios (using kill -9 also). Even the encoding stuffs were tested and carried out our basic test scenarios. Seems to work fine.
Did not test rolling restart with 0.92. By this week we may try to do some performance comparison with 0.92. Also Lars and I agreed for a point release too. So I am +1 on the RC. Regards Ram > -----Original Message----- > From: lars hofhansl [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Sunday, May 13, 2012 10:53 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available > for download > > OK, I'll change my tactic :) > > If there are no -1's by Wed, May 16th, I'll release RC4 as 0.94.0. > > -- Lars > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Stack <[email protected]> > To: lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 10:39 PM > Subject: Re: ANN: The third hbase 0.94.0 release candidate is available > for download > > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:26 PM, lars hofhansl <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Thanks Stack. > > > > So that's two +1 (mine doesn't count I guess). And no -1. > > Why doesn't yours count? Usually the RMs does, if they +1 it. So, > that'd be 3x+1 + a non-binding +1. > > > I talked to Ram offline, and we'll fix HBase with Hadoop 2.0.0 in a > 0.94 point release. > > > > I would like to see a few more +1's before I declare this the > official 0.94.0 release. > > > > You might be waiting a while (smile). Fellas seem to be busy... > > Good on you Lars, > St.Ack
