Do we have an umbrella JIRA for this? Seems like there is a lot of work to be done on this and it would help to have one similar to HBASE-5305 for the version compatibility stuff. We can link HBASE-5601 off it to start.
If not, I can create one. Greg On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com>wrote: > I'm up for that too. Just let me know and I'll be there. I've been poking > around with metrics a lot lately and so I have a few ideas. > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic < > otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > > Lars & Co., > > > > We're game for a chat (Skype voice, chat, phone...) maybe around the > > middle of next week. Alex is currently busy chasing fish in the > Caribbean. > > > > Otis > > ---- > > Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase - > > http://sematext.com/spm > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com> > > > To: dev@hbase.apache.org > > > Cc: > > > Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:07 AM > > > Subject: Metrics in 0.96 > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I propose that we clean up the metrics for 0.96 as well (if that is not > > already > > > underway. This includes switching to Hadoop Metrics v2 and adding all > > missing > > > stats, as well as fixing those that are misleading or useless. For that > > reason I > > > talked to our friends at Sematext during the Buzzwords HBase workshop, > > as well > > > as to our internal HBase team. We all seem to agree and I'd be happy to > > > setup some sort of call/task force to discuss what we need to work on > > etc. > > > Obviously I would love for someone from the FB team to also partake as > > they have > > > done heaps lately on that end - but I also understand if that is a > > timing issue. > > > > > > What do y'all think? My reasoning is that 0.96 might become 1.0, but I > > would > > > love for the metrics to be stable by then. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Lars > > > > > >
