I suggest continuing discussion on HBASE-4050. Cheers
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com>wrote: > I'm excited about the new accurate histogram, however I don't think that > we'll get it when we move to metrics2. Any direct usage would break > backward compat for all older hadoop installs. > For backwards compatibility on hadoop versions we will either have to > create a shim layer with reflection, or pull the code in. Since we already > have a MeticsHistogram I think pulling the code into hbase may be the right > choice. > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:15 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> > wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:10 PM, Alex Baranau <alex.barano...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Meanwhile I suggested taking on this one: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-4050 separately/first. > What > > do > > > you think? > > > > +1 > > > > In related discussion, it looks to me like Stack thinks pulling in the > > histogram accuracy improvement work via metrics2 is a good idea. > > > > Independent of this something I would like to be able to do is log > > metrics to a file as well as Ganglia concurrently, and metrics2 can do > > that. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > > Hein (via Tom White) > > >