Hi Greg,

I am going through all related JIRAs right now so that we can consolidate the 
effort into one umbrella issue. I should have that done today and will then 
list my findings. 

Lars

On Jun 23, 2012, at 2:23, Gregory Chanan <gcha...@cloudera.com> wrote:

> Do we have an umbrella JIRA for this?  Seems like there is a lot of work to
> be done on this and it would help to have one similar to HBASE-5305 for the
> version compatibility stuff.  We can link HBASE-5601 off it to start.
> 
> If not, I can create one.
> 
> Greg
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:03 AM, Elliott Clark <ecl...@stumbleupon.com>wrote:
> 
>> I'm up for that too.  Just let me know and I'll be there.  I've been poking
>> around with metrics a lot lately and so I have a few ideas.
>> 
>> On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Otis Gospodnetic <
>> otis_gospodne...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Lars & Co.,
>>> 
>>> We're game for a chat (Skype voice, chat, phone...) maybe around the
>>> middle of next week.  Alex is currently busy chasing fish in the
>> Caribbean.
>>> 
>>> Otis
>>> ----
>>> Performance Monitoring for Solr / ElasticSearch / HBase -
>>> http://sematext.com/spm
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ----- Original Message -----
>>>> From: Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com>
>>>> To: dev@hbase.apache.org
>>>> Cc:
>>>> Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 4:07 AM
>>>> Subject: Metrics in 0.96
>>>> 
>>>> Hi,
>>>> 
>>>> I propose that we clean up the metrics for 0.96 as well (if that is not
>>> already
>>>> underway. This includes switching to Hadoop Metrics v2 and adding all
>>> missing
>>>> stats, as well as fixing those that are misleading or useless. For that
>>> reason I
>>>> talked to our friends at Sematext during the Buzzwords HBase workshop,
>>> as well
>>>> as to our internal HBase team. We all seem to agree and I'd be happy to
>>>> setup some sort of call/task force to discuss what we need to work on
>>> etc.
>>>> Obviously I would love for someone from the FB team to also partake as
>>> they have
>>>> done heaps lately on that end - but I also understand if that is a
>>> timing issue.
>>>> 
>>>> What do y'all think? My reasoning is that 0.96 might become 1.0, but I
>>> would
>>>> love for the metrics to be stable by then.
>>>> 
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Lars
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 

Reply via email to