Expanding the search criteria in the link below, I found the following (with a patch):
HBASE-6073 Add support for scan filters in Thrift2 Cheers On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com> wrote: > Understood, but I hope my clarification helped to rectify that. I was not > in any way claiming REST is not current, but merely was commenting on the > fact that the thread had drifted off into a general PB or not discussion. I > still believe Thrift2 is the way to go forward and will work on it. I have > started looking at the JIRAs, but they are not very conclusive: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?filter=-4&jql=project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20component%20%3D%20Thrift%20AND%20status%20in%20(Open%2C%20%22In%20Progress%22%2C%20Reopened)%20ORDER%20BY%20createdDate%20DESC > > I was wondering if someone knows what the known issues are. But I can work > through that list and check the Thrift2 API against the client API to see > what is amiss. > > Lars > > On May 3, 2013, at 11:14 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > > > I didn't take offence, but it's a false equivalency. > > > > > > On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Lars George <lars.geo...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> No Andy, I was just saying, if we remove Thrift2 for a PB backed > gateway, > >> then we could as well remove them all. REST was just an example. No > offence > >> meant. > >> > >> Lars > >> > >> On May 3, 2013, at 6:04 PM, Andrew Purtell <apurt...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > >>> We don't have a proper REST API? Please provide more detail on what you > >>> think is lacking. The status of Thrift2 and REST are the same? The REST > >> API > >>> is not actively maintained? > >>> > >>> On Friday, May 3, 2013, Lars George wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Jimmy, > >>>> > >>>> Inline... > >>>> > >>>> On Apr 25, 2013, at 8:18 PM, Jimmy Xiang <jxi...@cloudera.com > >> <javascript:;>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> At first, I am +1 for removing it. We had a similar discussion > before, > >>>> and > >>>>> didn't pull the plug because of Tim's comment: > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >> > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/hbase-dev/201212.mbox/%3ccae9mebbh7v1phsbegtepbxg1h5drbs+ydvyo0akdr1d4jce...@mail.gmail.com%3E > >>>> > >>>> I am with Tim here (it was me that pushed Tim to complete this work in > >> the > >>>> first place). > >>>> > >>>>> To me, instead of complete and maintain Thrift2, it will be much > better > >>>> to > >>>>> come up a new one since we are on PB now. > >>>> > >>>> That is independent if you ask me. We should have a proper Thrift one, > >>>> same with REST. Or do you want to toss out REST as well since we now > >> have > >>>> PB RPCs? > >>>> > >>>> I am willing to work and maintain Thrift2, I said that before. This > >> thread > >>>> though got derailed in general wishful thinking, so could we please > >> maybe > >>>> vote if we want Thrift and more especially Thrift2. Because we either > >> throw > >>>> out Thrift in total for PB or maintain it for the time being. > >>>> > >>>> Thoughts? > >>>> > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Lars > >>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Jimmy > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 11:10 AM, Andrew Purtell < > apurt...@apache.org > >> <javascript:;> > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> I'm glad someone has stepped forward to be an active responsive > >>>> maintainer > >>>>>> of this piece of code. Maintenance is one issue, actual usage is > >>>> another. > >>>>>> Does anyone actually use this? What is the plan for Thrift? Do we > >>>> continue > >>>>>> with both interfaces through one or more subsequent versions? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:45 PM, Lars George < > lars.geo...@gmail.com > >> <javascript:;> > >>>>> > >>>>>> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am -1 to remove, took a long time to get it in there and should > >>>>>>> deprecate Thrift v1 - or else we are in the same mess as mapred and > >>>>>>> mapreduce is. We once replaced the entire client API and now we > can't > >>>> do > >>>>>>> this for Thrift? > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I am happy to work on v2 and fix or maintain it. It should be the > way > >>>>>>> forward methinks. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Lars > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> On Apr 24, 2013, at 21:53, Stack <st...@duboce.net <javascript:;>> > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> Thrift2 was supposed to be the future -- an API like the native > java > >>>>>> API > >>>>>>> -- > >>>>>>>> but it never got the support needed to make it a superset of > >> thrift1. > >>>>>>>> Meantime folks are running thrift1 in production and patching it > as > >>>>>> they > >>>>>>>> need extra calls and fixes. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> While we have two thrifts, thrift1 and thrift2, the latter of > which > >> we > >>>>>>> are > >>>>>>>> afraid to recommend because we do not know of any prod install, we > >> sew > >>>>>>>> confusion ("Which should I use?", "Doc only talks about > >> 'thrift'?"). > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> HBASE-8184 is a patch to remove thrift2 until it gets a sponsor > who > >>>> can > >>>>>>>> move it beyond thrift1 . I already have a +1 to remove. Will let > >> the > >>>>>>>> issue stew a day or two in case objection to thrift2 going away. > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>> St.Ack > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Best regards, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - Andy > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > >> Hein > >>>>>> (via Tom White) > >>>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> > >>> - Andy > >>> > >>> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet > Hein > >>> (via Tom White) > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > > > - Andy > > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein > > (via Tom White) > >