Makes sense Stack, I will get started on this and report here as well as on JIRA. Let's clean this thing up and get used.
On May 5, 2013, at 2:15, Stack <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi Ted, >> >> I have found that too by just searching all components for "thrift". Is >> that all though? I mean, why are we actually wanting to drop thrift2? > > See head of this thread for why to drop it. > > Would suggest a comprehensive review of thrift1/thrift2 to see where there > are holes (review of JIRA will not tell you this; my guess is folks tried > thrift2, found issues, then list told them use thrift1... if issues in > thrift1, they might file issues). For issues found, file issues to fill > the gaps so it is obvious this is getting some attention. If none, say so. > Would suggest a bit of testing too so you could confidently state "thrift2 > is as comprehensive as thrift1" and can be depended upon, etc. > > St.Ack
