On Sat, May 4, 2013 at 12:41 AM, Lars George <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Ted, > > I have found that too by just searching all components for "thrift". Is > that all though? I mean, why are we actually wanting to drop thrift2? > See head of this thread for why to drop it. Would suggest a comprehensive review of thrift1/thrift2 to see where there are holes (review of JIRA will not tell you this; my guess is folks tried thrift2, found issues, then list told them use thrift1... if issues in thrift1, they might file issues). For issues found, file issues to fill the gaps so it is obvious this is getting some attention. If none, say so. Would suggest a bit of testing too so you could confidently state "thrift2 is as comprehensive as thrift1" and can be depended upon, etc. St.Ack
